Security 5k results
Thursday, March 25, 2010 19:07Posted in category On the editor's desk
The good news is that I ran 8:14 splits. The bad news is wait until you see how bad my Anthem was. Wow. Sounded much better to me. We’ll have it up soon.
That’s me at #85, Louis Pfeifle (the “L” you’ve been wondering about), with a 25:35. I’m very pleased with #85.
But I’m more happy about the 249 finishers. That’s well beyond our expectations for the event and we’re ecstatic about the amount of money we’ve raised for Misson 500.
Here are the results (sorry about the small images - the results came in a web archive that I couldn’t convert easily into a table - I’ll find a better way later):






You can follow any responses to this entry through the //php post_comments_feed_link('RSS 2.0'); ?> RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.









Roger D. Shuman says:
March 25th, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Way to go Chris Hanson! Nice job representing Exacq!
Tweets that mention On the Editor’s Desk » Security 5k results -- Topsy.com says:
March 26th, 2010 at 12:48 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SecurityFeeds - RA. SecurityFeeds - RA said: SSN: Security 5k results http://bit.ly/dyAuAv [...]
silverhillroad says:
March 26th, 2010 at 7:21 am
Did Martha finish ahead of you?
Sam Pfeifle says:
March 26th, 2010 at 8:19 am
Yes, let me read that small type for you. Martha finished at #80, 5 spots ahead of me. I’m pleased to have been that close to her. She was the gold medal winner in the women 40+ bracket, for that matter. And I misread my own time last time around. I actually ran a 25:35, not 25:15.
Sam Pfeifle says:
March 26th, 2010 at 8:24 am
SDN managing editor Leischen beat me, too, for that matter, at #74. We’re a very fit bunch up in Maine.
Josh Grondin says:
March 28th, 2010 at 11:11 am
Hmmm… am I reading the first line right? It looks like the overall winner, Mr. Eric Chabin, was 99 years old and finished in under 20 minutes?
Sam Pfeifle says:
March 28th, 2010 at 7:55 pm
Yeah, I’m not sure what happened with that. They must have entered his age wrong or something. He was an older guy though - easily in his 40s. Definitely 99, I guess.
Alex Gordon says:
April 8th, 2010 at 1:42 am
угу……..
That’s me at #85, Louis Pfeifle (the “L” you’ve been wondering about), with a 25:35. I’m very pleased with #85…..