It's been pretty quiet lately, as people save up their big news for next week's ASIS show, but some of the big news is starting to leak out. I'll keep you posted as I learn things, but here are a couple of solid items:
1. Bosch, Sony and Axis announced a little of what their standards forum is going to look like. They're calling it the ONVIF (for Open Network Video Interface Forum) and you can find it at www.onvif.org. Read the press release about what you might find there, here. This is something to watch closely.
As for whether ONVIF rolls off the tongue? I'm thinking not. I've been trying desperately for 10 minutes to think of a funny acronym that would have worked, but I'm coming up empty. Post anything interesting in the comments.
2. ObjectVideo announced today an OEM agreement with Pelco, whereby they'll be embedded in the brand-spanking Pelco Sarix technology based cameras scheduled for release in early 2009. You can read the full story here. As much as their competitors love to slag OV, you've got to admit they keep landing big agreements. Their OV-Ready slate of partners is impressive, and I can't imagine Pelco made their analytics-partner choice lightly.
Well, the guys at SecureNet must have had a nice weekend.
DFW Airport announced Friday they're awarding SecureNet a $4.98 million job to upgrade the facility's camera systems over the next three to five years. The article is a little confusing, but it seems like that number should grow, too:
The appropriation doesn't include the closed-circuit cameras, which still have to be purchased.
And the first paragraph has this part:
... a $4.98 million contract to increase the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport's capacity to gradually add 1,975 security cameras.
So, they're adding 1,975 cameras to the 1,590 they already have? That kind of seems impossible, but maybe it's true. If so, there's plenty more margin to be had for SecureNet, unless DFW has some direct-to-manufacturer deal, and SecureNet's just doing the install, but that seems hard to believe.
Great get for a regional integrator like SecureNet. They're Microsoft certified and seem in general to be a really progressive outfit.
Sorry about the lack of posts this week. For one thing, everybody's holding onto their big news until ASIS, which means there's nothing coming across the wire. For another thing, I spent Wed. and Thurs. in Chicago checking out a new internal training program that Stanley's putting together to more aggressively tackle IP-based security systems and fire installations.
It's very progressive and I'll get into it with a story for the October paper, but suffice it to say that they're trying to get out ahead of the market and their employees are lapping up the free training and certification. They're seeing positive early sales returns from the investment, too, so the business case for it is solid.
But that's not what I'm here to blog about, people. I'm here to blog about green cars. They're hot in the security world nowadays.
Check out this story from California about a security guarding firm that's gone electric. Good for them. They're saving money and get to be proud of their environmental stance.
Plus, great press:
And as if saving money and helping the environment aren't enough reasons to have an electric car, Maxwell said the low-noise car enhances crime-fighting.
"It's quiet. You can sneak up on people," he said.
Still, there are some drawbacks:
Scruggs said the fuel costs for his two fuel-powered patrol cars have also gone down since they are only used during the day when it is too hot to drive the electric cars which don't have air conditioning.
Yeah, I'm guessing if you're driving around in Palm Springs, air conditioning might be a necessity. They may want to address that in the next line of electric cars. I, of course, drive around in a car with no air conditioning, but I live in Maine, where you need heat in July half the time, so it's not a problem.
I want one of these electric cars very badly, but I'm guessing they would suck more than a little in the snow, and that would definitely be a problem. Anyone know if they come with three-wheel drive and studded tires?
Congratulations to APXAlarmÃ¢â‚¬â€a residential security company that's pioneered the successful summer sales model, and along the way has become one of the largest companies in the countryÃ¢â‚¬â€for being named Business of the Year by a Utah Chamber of Commerce. Here's the Aug. 31 press release. (You have to scroll down a bit to read it.)
I do a lot of reporting on Apx, and it's one of the companies that I find the most interesting. Everyone's got an opinion about APX. They're wildly successful, and they certainly manage to piss off lots of local alarm companies. Now, I've got no doubt that there are many legitimate complaints out there, but it seems to me that where there are problems, it has much to do with the nature of the businessÃ¢â‚¬â€door-to-door salespeople can be very annoying. (Double the annoyance factor when the person doing the knocking is a 20-something know-it-all.)
Apx is also experiencing some normal growing pains, figuring out the best ways to manage its enormous sales force. That's something they've got a responsibility to do, and Apx execs appear to be taking that responsibility seriously.
In fairness, there are also several other summer-sales model companies (and traditional-sales-model alarm companies) that are out there knocking doors. They're not all Apx employees.
I wondering though, does it ever seem like some of the local companies who complain about Apx are doing a lot of, as my mother would say, bellyaching? Like they just don't like the competition? Like they think they own the customers in their town or region?
However you feel about Apx, you've got to admit, it's a remarkably successful sales model, managed by a smart group of people. Add the timing of this release to a list of their smart moves. It appears from my online searching that they were given the award in May...but, looking for some positive ink, they just made the announcement Aug. 31.
Here's a bizarre story
that found its way into my inbox over the long holiday weekend.
According to this news source, the co-owner of Milwaukee-based
Wisconsin Security Solutions is accused of taking security into his own
hands by making homemade explosives (or at least purchasing the
supplies and equipment to do so) in an effort to blow up some people he
Police said he planned to target homes of local
gang members he came across in the course of his job. "It appears the
motivation was some intimidation by what he perceived as gang members
against employees of his company," Smith said. ...
Leyer admitted to talking about making bombs to blow up gang houses,
but he said he never intended to actually do it.
Uh huh. I
mean who doesn't regularly purchase test tubes, rubber tubing,
galvanized pipe, flares and shotgun shells? Police are just so keyed up
Anyway, I did a quick Google search for Wisconsin
Security Solutions and only came up with an address listing and brief
description. Looks like this company is mostly in the guarding business
rather than electronic security, which I imagine is a relief to most of
you (the description even says this company rents guard dogs, which is
a first for me).
I'd say that if this situation were an episode of Little House on the Prairie
and there needed to be a moral lesson learned, Half Pint (that's
Laura's nickname, for those of you who weren't adolescent girls in the
80s) would need to be reminded that there are just some things you
shouldn't take into your own hands (even if security is your business).
It also goes to show that every industry has its crazies.
Lately, people have been sending me any number of articles about the importance of passwords, whether it's this bit about making sure your password can't be easily guessed or today's article from Ars Technica about the likelihood that a fired systems administrator will steal your passwords and use them against you maliciously.
Why is this a physical security problem? Well, obviously, as physical security systems move increasingly onto the network, we've heard lots of talk about how integrators need to work with and sell to the IT department. Well, maybe there isn't exactly the same moral certitude in the IT department as there might be in the security department. Maybe there is. But it's at least something that isn't often talked about when we talk about "selling to IT," etc.
That Ars Technica article reports these findings:
The results of the Trust, Security and Passwords study are based on a survey of 300 system administrators at the Infosecurity 2008 event in Europe. Of the study respondents, 88 percent admitted they would take sensitive data with them when leaving their current place of employment, and approximately one-third said that they would abscond with company password lists.
Of course, IT departments already have vital roles in the protection of data, which can be more valuable that physical assets, but before physical security systems were networked, they didn't exactly have the power to risk people's lives. Now, increasingly, they do.
If, out of spite, a fired employee builds a hidden doorway into your access control software on his way out the door, that could be very bad, indeed. As systems integrators, it's vital that you make management aware of who should be privy to which passwords involved with the security system, and why. Especially if the head of security comes from a physical background, and is particularly reliant on the IT department for help in administering the system, you need to provide that person with the particulars of what to look for should an IT employee with access to the system be replaced. And you should make certain that final access authority resides with the security department and not with the IT department, to make sure accountability is where it ought to be.
Anyone else have the experience of a supposedly "nice" guy wiping his hard drive clean on the way out the door? If so, you know how important it is to manage employees who've been let go. Emphasize this to your customers and make sure the security system is prepared for vindictive attacks.
Oh, and don't use your cat's name as your password. I would never do that. Rather, I combine the name of my old, dead cat, with the name of my all-time favorite prog rock album. That's much more secure.
Interesting news coming from cable/broadband provider Comcast today: It will begin placing a bandwidth limit on its subscribers.
Of course, that limit is extremely high. 250GB. For any normal consumer, that means:
Send 50 million e-mails (at 0.05 KB/e-mail)
Download 62,500 songs (at 4 MB/song)
Download 125 standard-definition movies (at 2 GB/movie)
Upload 25,000 hi-resolution digital photos (at 10 MB/photo).
But what if you're a small business and you're monitoring your 5 megapixel surveillance cameras from your home office? Will corporate users who don't have a dedicated T-1 or greater come under the same limits? If so, will this affect how satellite offices can be monitored by a central command center?
Much of the talk about the limits on IP surveillance has focused on bandwidth, and we see here that bandwidth is clearly at a premium, even for a provider like Comcast with all the bandwidth in the world.
Something to think about over a long holiday weekend. Or maybe not think about. I'm mostly going to be thinking about how nice the lake water is, and how sturdy the deck beneath me is, and how comfortable the chair I'm in is, and how much I wish my kids would go take a nap already. But you can think about video and bandwidth if you want.
I'm a little bit frightened. ScanSource is trying to get all viral with its promotion of its ImpactNow event, coming Nov. 10 to Orlando, and the videos are actually kind of funny.
Find the latest one here. I'd embed it, but I can't figure out how at the moment. So go watch it.
Okay, good. I wanted to think it was inane and unfunny, because I like my security companies like I like my music - no funny involved - but I was sort of smirking despite myself. The whole "punch you in the mustache" riff isn't bad and might even be improvised, which I like more. It's pretty clear ScanSource actually hired professional actors and stuff. This is a scary level of media sophistication for a security industry where many manufacturers still snail mail press releases. Well done by ScanSource on at least one level.
However (maybe I should have written "HOWEVER," since this is a big however), is it really true that ScanSource believes the target candidates for its ImpactNow event are jamokes who sit on their couch together, calling one another "dude" and "bro," playing Wii and obsessing over Danica Patrick? I understand they're going for ironic, but isn't this the exact image of the industry many people are trying to dispel?
Hey, high-level IT guys, come work in the security industry, where we all have southern accents, wear ballcaps, and obsess about meeting mildly attractive female racecar drivers! Cuz we're all guys! And guys play video games and objectify women! Ha!
Are the guys on that couch the same guys who are coming to ImpactNow to see ex-Apple exec Steve Wozniak this year, or the ones who were impressed by this presentation from Jack Welch last year?
It seems unlikely. The ImpactNow events have real content that's worthwhile. Why not have nerdy computer type obsession about seeing their idol, Wozniak, who invented their favorite all-time operating system or something?
For those people trying to professionalize the industry, appeals like, "win this car," or "come see this babe," are simply counterproductive. When you go to journalism conferences, I can assure you there aren't any appeals along the lines of, "learn how to write an effective lede after you get an autograph from hottie softballer Jennie Finch!" When my wife evaluates audiology conferences (as female-dominated an industry as I've ever witnessed), she isn't enticed to attend with, "fit hearing aids the way Tom Brady fits into his Levi Jeans."
So, good for ScanSource being creative and entertaining, but let's not forget we're trying to elevate our game here a little.
What in the name of Charlton Heston are they smoking in Harrold, Texas? Did you hear about the new "security measures" they're taking in this Texas burg to protect students? Teachers are allowed to carry guns. Here's the story
There are these restrictions, though: (from a separate AP story)
"In order for teachers and staff to carry a pistol, they must have a Texas license to carry a concealed handgun; must be authorized to carry by the district; must receive training in crisis management and hostile situations and have to use ammunition that is designed to minimize the risk of ricochet in school halls."
So in a few weeks I'll be heading down to Atlanta to attend ASIS International. I had a great time in Atlanta when I went for a preview visit in February (partially because there wasn't four feet of snow on the ground like there was here in Maine). One of the highlights was the Georgia Aquarium, which is an awesome venue (minus the hoards of children) with its three beluga whales, massive whale sharks and many intriguing exhibits.
I read an article today from CNN about the latest addition to the Georgia Aquarium in the form of a 450-pound manta ray named Nandi. She has a nine-foot wingspan and made her debut in the acquarium just yesterday. I hope that someone out there is having some sort of event in the aquarium (it has an awesome conference room that has a window into the beluga whale tank) and, more importantly, will send along an invite to yours truly. If not, Nandi sounds like a great reason to get off the show floor.